![]() My last game I was leading in score and was the biggest civ until two of the other AI civs joined forces and made it a close run in. Permanent Alliances is a nice option because it can throw an unexpected spanner into the works by derailing an otherwise easy cruise to victory. I'm at a critical stage of needing Rifling ASAP! In my current game, I'm the biggest civ on the continent, but without Iron and Horses I'm having real trouble repelling the constant onslaught of Spanish Conquistadors and Roman Cavalry with my French Muskateers. As a result, nothing can be taken for granted each game. The lack of immediate land to expand into often means there's a shortage of vital resources (Iron and Horses in my current game!). Coupling Aggressive Civs with a Terra map leads to a very volatile situation, one which involves many interactions - AI to AI and AI to human. I found standard settings on non-Terra maps to be extremely peaceful and it wasn't uncommon to go through entire games without any AI to AI wars let alone any wars that weren't started by me. In terms of other settings I think the game is best played with Aggressive Civs and Permanent Alliances. The promise of a barbarian infested New World to explore and settle mid to late game is excellent as is the close quarters action in the early game on the continent where all the civs start. ![]() However, after a few games using standard sized Terra maps, this has since become my new favourite. the opposite being surrounded on a Pangea!). I've now tried quite a few of the map types and I my old favourite used to be a Continents or Archipelago map, and the main reason for this was because it emphasised the naval aspect and usually provided each civ with some inherent safety (i.e. Civ 4 offers a few alternative ways of playing the game and I thought I might be interesting to see what people's favourite settings are for a typical game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |